Various Available Treatments for Attachment Disorders

Professional-06
Image by crysnrob via Flickr

Attachment disorders are behavioral disorders that develop in children during the first of two years of growth. They develop as a result of negative experiences during child’s early relationships. Psychologists argue that children who feel insecure, isolated or abandoned eventually learn that they cannot rely on others and view the world as a dangerous place. They exhibit physical and psychological distancing from adults, uncontrollable anger and poor impulse control.

Research has shown that children who suffer from reactive attachment disorders are likely to experience difficulties in forming healthy loving and lasting intimate relationships in their future life because they lack meaningful skills to do so. This leads to lack of trust, low self esteem and desire to be in control.
Attachment disorders can be repaired by building the child’s sense of security. This is important because the sole cause of attachment disorders is lack of trust and feelings of insecurity. Creating a sense of security therefore makes it easy for the child to accept love and support.

Setting consistent limits and loving boundaries for children with attachment disorders makes their world less scaring and gives them power to be in control over their lives. When such children understand what is expected of them, what is acceptable and what is not acceptable as well as the consequences of disobeying, they positively take charge over their lives and become less rebellious, knowing that they are in control.

Psychologists advice people living with children who suffer from attachment disorders to create secure infant attachment by always remaining calm when the child is upset. This is because the child has limited skills to handle his/her feelings and needs help. Staying calm therefore teaches the child that the feelings of anger can be managed.

Other alternatives for repairing attachment disorders include, being always available to resolve any conflicts, owning up mistakes, reconciling, listening, talking and playing with your child.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Depression And Parenting A Child With Attachment Difficulties

by Beverly White, MA, LPC

I see “IT” in my office every day. I hear “IT” repeatedly, yet no one directly addresses “IT”. “IT” is the low-grade depression experienced by many parents of a child with attachment difficulties. The symptoms vary from very mild generalized feelings of not knowing what’s wrong to a full-blown feeling that “I give up. If I have to live the rest of my life like this, then I want out”. Out means things like leaving the marriage, relinquishing the child(ren), and (in rare cases) feelings of suicide.

Some of the most common and notable signs of depression include: low energy; low to no motivation; changes in sleeping and eating patterns; feelings of ambivalence; an increase in irritability (not due to PMS or other factors); decreased self-esteem; decreased interest in sex; decreasing ability to focus and concentrate; memory problems; and sometimes thoughts of suicide or the intention to commit suicide.

Since so much of the energy of the parents of these children is extended toward the child, parents most often fail to see that they aren’t saving enough or giving enough time and attention to their own needs. Once they do take notice that they have slipped into a depressive state, they typically blame themselves. The only thing they could be at fault for is forgetting to take care of themselves while parenting their children.

Children with Reactive Attach-ment Disorder don’t learn reciprocity during the first year of life. Therefore, they don’t function as reciprocal human beings. Parents end up giving and giving to the child, without getting anything back and being emotionally replenished.

Most of us who come from the 50’s generation were taught by our parents to sacrifice for our children, and to put the needs of our children first. This philosophy will most assuredly lead us into the black hole of depression when parenting children who don’t reciprocate, and it can put us into a less than effective and co-dependent role when parenting our other children who do reciprocate.

Children with attachment and bonding difficulties are experts at controlling even the most meaningless situations. Their eternal vigil to obtain and stay in control leaves parents in a position of being continually tested and challenged for the role of parent. Since the attachment disordered child wants to be his/her own parent (boss), parents are constantly exerting energy to maintain their appropriate place and job as parent. Out of an unconscious fear that not being in control means not surviving, the child works overtime to wrest control from the parents. Thus, parents must unconsciously work overtime to stay one step ahead of the child, and wonder why, on a conscious level, they feel so exhausted all the time.

If you often find yourself wondering “what’s wrong”, or “why don’t I feel better about my parenting skills” (or about my life), then it’s time to recognize that the challenges of parenting your child with attachment difficulties may be creating a low-grade depression for you. Start talking to your spouse, friends, clergy, therapist, and/or other parents. Get some support and relief. Assert yourself to reach out and connect with others who can understand your situation and relate to your feelings. Otherwise, you may find yourself unable to function as a parent, or worse.

Beverly Baker White is a therapist in private practice in both Littleton and Evergreen, Colorado.



Does Attachment Therapy Work?

by Liz Randolph, PhD

A frequent criticism heard by attachment therapists has to do with whether or not there is any research to show that attachment therapy works. Up until recently, the answer to this question was no. However, in June 1996 an outcome study was conducted by Loy Goodwin, PhD to examine whether or not attachment therapy is effective with severely disturbed children. Dr. Goodwin used the Attachment Disorder Symptom Checklist (ADSCL) developed by the Attachment Center at Evergreen, assigning a number value to the options of never, moderate, or severe (0, 1, or 2 respectively) to assess changes in the type and frequency of behavior problems exhibited by 38 children (ages 5 to 15) receiving intensive attachment therapy at ACE between 1993 and 1995. Parents completed the ADSCL in the week prior to the start of the intensive, and then again anywhere between two months and two years after completing intensive attachment therapy.

Because the reliability and validity of the ADSCL have never been investigated, the results of Dr. Goodwin’s study can only be interpreted descriptively. Although Dr. Goodwin used statistical procedures with the data she obtained, finding significant decreases in almost all of the behaviors described on the ADSCL (abnormal eating habits was the only item that showed no significant change), the lack of reliability and validity data on the ADSCL makes it inappropriate to interpret the data in this way.

However, what is important about the results of Dr. Good-win’s study is the finding that the ADSCL shows a 50% reduction in overall symptoms of attachment disorder following two weeks of intensive attachment therapy. In addition, behavioral changes continued to be present as much as two years following the completion of the intensive (13 of the children studied were reevaluated more than 18 months after the intensive was completed).

Dr. Goodwin’s study indicates the need for more outcome research about attachment therapy. Better designed and controlled outcome studies are currently under way by ATTACh, by Robin Meyeroff at the Attachment and Bonding Center of Ohio, here at ACE, and by this author. Results of these studies, although not yet ready to be published, are promising.

The complete text of Dr. Good-win’s dissertation is available from ACE for $5.00, plus .22 tax and $4.50 shipping and handling.

The Evolution of Attachment Therapy

Dianne Allred and Gregory C. Keck, PhD.

We’ve been hearing some confusion being expressed by folks across the country regarding attachment work, specific techniques, and “who” does “what.”

There are many attachment therapists and attachment programs in Colorado, and a growing number around the country. Each practitioner has his/her own philosophies and methods, which may or may not be similar to others who are also doing attachment work.

For example, there seems to be a fair amount of confusion and misinformation about a therapeutic technique called “holding therapy.” Over the years, therapists have developed their own versions of this technique (which often don’t even resemble the original holding therapy), but most of them call it by the same name. Television programs which have depicted particular methods of certain therapists, have misled the public into believing that everything called holding therapy looks the same, and is practiced in the same way by every therapist for every child.

Many people have also been misinformed by well meaning child activists who have either never actually seen our work, or have seen small clips of old tapes taken completely out of context. They have mistakenly generalized all attachment therapies and therapists. As a result of these overzealous attempts to protect (and the passing on of outdated or incorrect information), some children and families may not get the help they need.

Like any other field of work, attachment therapy has evolved with time. Techniques that worked with children 25 (or even 5) years ago have evolved into different techniques that have been developed to help children today. Methods that will be used 5 or 10 years from now might look entirely different as well.

Constant research, study and self-evaluation is necessary to be able to find the best ways of reaching each child’s heart. At The Attachment Center at Evergreen, and at The Attachment and Bonding Center of Ohio, a thorough assessment is done of each child and family. Therapeutic and parenting techniques are designed around the needs of that family. These may include; reparenting, inner child work, cognitive restructuring, psychodrama, holding therapy, EMDR, sensory integration work, auditory reprocessing, offender treatment, therapeutic foster parenting, and/or a number of other methods that can be accessed to facilitate healing.

All work is done in a safe, nurturing manner and environment, by highly skilled professionals.When holding therapy is used, the therapists cradle the child in their arms, much the same way you would hold a small infant.

All of the key components of bonding are present: eye contact, smiles, touch, movement, voice. This facilitates “connection,” physically, verbally, visually and emotionally. It recreates the feeling of security that a baby experiences with a nurturing, consistent caretaker. It also initiates the reprocessing of the infant bonding cycle, which was interrupted for children with attachment disorder. It allows the child to safely release, and receive help to resolve, the emotional trauma which has prevented them from developing trust and love and the ability to experience joy in their lives.

Some people have referred to holding therapy as “rage reduction” therapy. This has been a source of much misinformation, as well. We think it is a limited description of what is accomplished during the therapeutic process. While reducing rage that a child may be feeling is a desirable and necessary outcome, not all children who have attachment issues operate out of a rage state. For those who do, the releasing process helps to clear away the rubble so they can begin to experience other feelings. Emotions that they often attempt to ignore – sadness, hurt and fear – can surface within a safe context, with safe people.

The majority of the process is spent using a variety of other interventions and strategies to facilitate healing of core issues of abandonment, grief and loss. to opening their hearts to trust and love, developing reciprocal relationships and responsible behavior.

The Attachment Center at Evergreen, Inc. has been involved in Attachment Therapy since 1972. Next year will be ACE’s 25th anniversary of helping children and families. The mission of the center is “…a commitment to transforming the lives of children with attachment disorder and their families, and promoting healthy parent/child attachments.”

ACE’s recently published book, “Give Them Roots, Then Let Them Fly,” is available by calling the office of The Attachment Center at Evergreen.

The Attachment and Bonding Center of Ohio has been doing Attachment Therapy since 1990. It has an adoption sensitive focus, and strives to support the adoptive family. Maintaining adoptive families is a clear focus, as children who grow up in institutional or other non-permanent situations are consistently over-represented in both the penal system and the homeless population. ABC of Ohio also provides training and educational services to a wide array of parents and professional groups in an effort to familiarize people with the unique difficulties associated with children/adolescents experiencing attachment difficulties.

Attachment: Biology, Evolution and Environment

Terry M. Levy, PhD., Licensed Clinical Psychologist

Over the course of thousands of generations, evolution has imprinted in our brains and bodies automatic tendencies that guide htmlects of our behavior and social life, such as: responding to threat, danger and loss; bonding with a child and mate; creating and protecting a family. These instinctual reactions have become etched into our nervous systems because they have enabled us to adapt, to handle the recurring challenges of life, and to perpetuate our species.

Attachment between infant and caregiver is a prime example of a behavior pattern that is rooted in biology and evolution. Attachment behavior has become programmed into human beings, and is found to operate similarly in almost all cultures. The purpose and function of attachment is the same regardless of ethnic or cultural differences: to keep the baby close to the caregiver for safety and protection; to allow the child to explore and learn within a safe context (“secure base”); and to develop a loving and re-ciprocal relationship which can be passed on through generations. To fully understand healthy attachment and attachment disorder, we must consider how this biologically-based process occurs in the context of environmental stimulation, family roles, and brain chemistry.

The nuclear family evolved as the social environment best suited to provide for the needs and development of the young; that is. to foster healthy attachment. Of all mammals, the human baby requires the longest period of nurturance and protection. Instinctual attachment behaviors (clinging, following, sucking, smiling, gazing, touching) emerge within this context of prolonged helplessness and dependency. In order for attachment to occur, however, there must be stimulation from the environment. In other words, the biologically-based attachment behaviors must be activated by signs or signals from caregivers. There are many examples of this reciprocal pattern among various species. The young herring gull opens his beak wide to receive food in response to seeing the red spot on the beak of the parent gull. The duckling follows the first moving object it sees (hopefully the mother); mother is a stimulus moving at a particular rate. These stimuli are called “social releasers”, and there are similar patterns operating in human families. The baby’s smile evokes powerful feelings in the mother and father. The mother’s smile provokes feelings of comfort in the infant. Crying, mutual gazing, holding (“contact comfort”) and feeding all provoke strong responses in baby and caregivers. By understanding the interaction between maturation (instinct) and experience (environmental stimulation), we can begin to appreciate the devastating effects of abuse and neglect on the child’s attachment. The “prewired” attachment does not emerge without the necessary external (parental) ingredients.

The issues of family roles is also significant when addressing attachment. Again, let’s consider male/female roles from the perspective of biology, evolution and adaptation. Humans evolved from isolated gatherers to cooperative hunter/gatherers. Patterns emerged that led to distinctive gender roles. Males became more efficient hunters and females more focused on caring for the young. A monogamous pair, each with specialized roles and responsibilities, provided a context to enhance survival and offer maximal protection and nurturance to their offspring.This social arrangement required a sense of loyalty, deeply felt emotional attachment, and commitment to mutual goals.The women could devote time to maternal functions, trusting that they had their partner’s support. The men could leave home base secure in knowing that their mates were faithful while they were away at the hunt. In other words, male/female roles developed out of practical necessity: the need to adapt to the challenges and demands of life.

These same needs are present in today’s families: loyalty, trust, security, stability, commitment, cooperation, support. Unfortunately, there are trends operating that prevent healthy adaptation and attachment from developing. In 1995, more than 40% of American families were fatherless (up from 17% in 1960). Each year a half million babies are born to teenage girls. Over three million children were reported maltreated last year (60% increase in the last ten years). Rates of out-of-home placements, prenatal drug exposure and family violence are increasing at an alarming rate. Thus, the function of the family as an environment for safety, security, healthy social learning, and positive emotional attachment, is now questionable.

To further understand attachment, we must consider the function and chemistry of the brain. Our brain is actually composed of three parts (“triune brain”), each evolving at a different time and for a different purpose. The Reptilian Brain, or brain stem, was the first to evolve. It regulates basic life functions (digestion, breathing, reproduction, metabolism), and is responsible for primitive sexual, territorial and survival instincts. The next part of the brain to develop, the Limbic System, accompanied the arrival of the first mammals. This provided the ability to experience emotions, refined the capacity for learning and memory, and created the ability to self-heal (immune system). This part of the brain is the seat of all relationship bonds and controls attachment behavior. The Neocortex is the third and final part of the brain to evolve, and is what makes us uniquely human. It controls thinking, reasoning, creativity, and symbolic language. It enables us to observe our own emotions and (hopefully) have choices about our response.

Thus, much of our social behavior is controlled by the “old brain” (the first two parts to evolve), not by our higher intellect. The old brain governs maternal instinct, attachment behavior, self-preservation, and stress-related responses. When threat or danger is sensed, a part of the Limbic System (amygdala) triggers the release of stress hormones. Norepinephrine increases the brain’s overall reactivity, making the senses more alert. Dopamine mobilizes the body for action (“fight or flight”), increasing heart rate and blood pressure, and rivets attention on the source of the fear.

How does this relate to children and attachment_ Children with attachment disorder have often been victims of abuse, neglect and multiple separations/disruptions. Their trauma, fear, anxiety and painful emotions are lodged in the primitive portion of their brains (“old brain”). This is why traditional cognitive and behavioral therapy is not usually effective with these children. Conventional therapeutic approaches are directed towards the Neocortex, and this intellectual approach does not provide access to these children in ways that are necessary for healing and positive change. Alternative approaches that promote attachment behaviors are more useful. The holding/nurturing approach, for example, stimulates the part of the brain responsible for attachment. It is often helpful to provide social releasers (eye contact, smile, safe touch, gentle movement) in the holding/nurturing position, for the child who was deprived of healthy attachment.

In summary, attachment is instinctive, rooted in thousands of years of human evolution. Healthy attachment only emerges, however, with certain kinds of cues or signals from caregivers. Maltreatment prevents the natural development of healthy attachment, and triggers the release of stress hormones in the “old brain”. We need to understand what children and parents need both in families and in therapy to provide real healing.



The A.D.D. Epidemic

Foster Cline, M.D.

Excerpts from: Reasons and Significance of Societal Mayhem and Severe Disturbances in the Population

All over America, the pathetic scene repeats itself: The five or six year old dumps out the Tinker Toys and stares at them. Clueless. He doesn’t have the slightest idea what to do with them. For Christmas, a seven year old girl is given Lincoln Logs. She is mildly curious at first. She tries briefly putting them together and then quits. “It’s too hard.” In an unfocused way, she wanders into the bedroom, turns on the TV and watches a Disney video.

Out on the front line, our schools literally reel as across America hundreds of thousands, if not millions of kids are diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder. All across the land, parents seek answers to help them understand their learning disabled or attention deficit disordered children.

What is this epidemic of Attention Deficit Disorder?  How is it defined?  Briefly, the children’s thinking easily fragments. It is hard for them to focus and carry through a task. Their attention wanders. Often the children are impulsive and often they are behavior problems. It does not seem to be a problem borne solely of poor parenting, for high achieving, loving and responsive parents have children who are part of the epidemic. There is good indication that htmlects of Attention Deficit Disorder are genetic. As is the case in many learning disorders, the father or mother may have had similar problems when they were younger. But is genetics enough to account for this epidemic! No, for genetic disorders are never epidemic in nature. Purely genetic disorders tend to have stable numbers or, if severe, are self limiting. No, something other than genetics is accounting for the epidemic.

First, in attempting to understand the problem, it is important to see how the definition of Attention Deficit Disorder has changed with time. Twenty-five years ago, when I was a young psychiatrist in training at the University of Washington, Attention Deficit Disorder was seen as a true disorder of attention. That is, it was noted that the children’s attention fragmented easily and that they could not pay attention to television shows. This is no longer true. Modern authority after modern authority stresses that attention deficit disordered children can pay attention to TV and are able to play video games. As a matter of fact, far from not being able to attend television, the playing of video games or watching TV is often used in the primary grades as a reinforcer or reward for behaviorally disturbed and learning disturbed children. Video tapes are used as a teaching tool across the primary and elementary grade spectrum with increasing frequency. Far from now being primarily an attention problem, Attention Deficit Disorder could more correctly be labeled an intention disorder. That is, the children fragment when they should be intending to do something – to accomplish a goal, start or complete a project. In my experience as a child psychiatrist, it appears the majority of children labeled Attention Deficit Disorder have no problem at all if they are being entertained, playing a video game, or watching TV. The entire problem seems to revolve around getting the job done. Whether the job is putting tinkertoys together, building with Lincoln Logs, focusing on a monopoly game, or completing a school assignment.

Regardless of possible professional disagreements over symptoms, almost all professionals observers, in both the fields of education and child therapy are in unanimous agreement that there is an epidemic problem that effects the learning ability of America’s children.

Much of the societal breakdown that the United States is now experiencing is secondary to millions of infants and toddlers not being exposed to the appropriate environmental stimulation at the necessary developmental age.

The importance of the first year of life simply cannot be overemphasized. The first year lays the foundation for four essential and related human thought and personality traits: Causal thinking; Conscience; Basic Trust; The ability to delay gratification.

Upon these variables, civilization is built. If we meet a person walking the streets at night without them, we’re dead. Without them, civilization as we know it is lost!

The “normal” first year with it’s foundation of basic trust, and a “normal” second year with it’s essential elements of control, limits and rules which the child must internalize are essential for the development of a child who can focus and learn normally.

Poor experiences in the first two years explains the difficulty in learning of a large number of American children who grow up in abusive situations or with parents who are simply unable to provide discipline and have poor parenting techniques. Abuse and neglect which are accompanied by inconsistency and pain destroy the development of both causal thinking and conscience. Planful thinking is only possible if the infant lives in a consistent environment, and conscience can only develop in the presence of loving responses. Only individuals with a conscience can feel remorse, have a poor self image, feel honestly guilty, or want to mend their ways.

There are, nevertheless, a massive percentage of the children who are part of the ADD, impulse-ridden epidemic that have good parents. These are parents who did discipline the child during toddlerhood and who insure that the child developed Basic Trust during the first year. Many of these children were loving infants and responsive toddlers. It simply becomes obvious that the children have trouble learning, focusing, and thoughtfully carrying-through on tasks when they arrive in preschool and kindergarten. So what accounts for the large number of ADD children of loving parents who had adequately disciplined toddlers?

At an essential time of brain developmental readiness for task mastery, today’s three and four-year-olds, the children who Erikson characterized as being at the stage of Initiative and Industry are watching television and enjoying video tapes.

And therein lies the basic problem. In fact, reflecting the television and video game generation, most of the items for younger children in Toys-R-Us or any toy outlet reflect an emphasis on Sensory input, and rudimentary motor skills, but rarely encourage creativity, task focus, job completion and mastery. Even if they are offered for sale, tinkertoys, Legos, Lincoln logs, and alphabet blocks are not the big sellers. What sells big is the video films and video games. Game Boy, Nintendo, the Little Mermaid and Aladdin. Those are the items that make millions. And of course children are exposed to more child movies than ever before. When parents “do” something with small children now, it relatively seldom involves really “doing” anything. The parents watch TV with the children, enjoy the televised game together, go to the movies or maybe, more rarely, go to the zoo. Relatively rarely do today’s exhausted, single, dating, divorced, commuting parents actually sit down and do something with their small children.

But it is more than that! Today’s parents, who themselves grew up in front of the TV, themselves do not know how to do things with their children. Even if they knew of the importance of helping small children with focus and task completion, they, themselves, don’t know how to make a kite or tin can telephone. They don’t know how to cover chairs with masking tape, they don’t know about the corner grocery were the child sells cans of food opened from the bottom. They don’t know about sewing on buttons with their child or making paper dolls. But most importantly, they know nothing of the developmental necessity of doing something with their preschool aged child. They, themselves grew up with Big Bird and Sesame street. And now they go to movies and watch TV as a family. And when their three and four-year-old child gets bored, they, as good parents, have a library of “good” video – “Disney” video for their child to watch.

Real education is dialog!! – Real education involves a feeling of mastery, ability to respond to situations, to articulate ideas, and respond thoughtfully. Whether we talk about leadership, creativity, responsibility, or motivation we are describing action. Television encourages passive responses. Certainly it encourages absorption, and arguably understanding, but it does not, and cannot, by it’s very nature encourage doing, mastery, task completion, creativity, independent thinking – all those things associated with being a functioning and productively busy human being. Schools must by their nature focus on doing and task completion.

If kids have so little internal controls, and the parents so little discipline that such external devices must be used, the parent/child relationship is already shot. And for most normal children, they are far more affected by watching. It is the process, not the content. Particularly at the critical younger ages.

New Findings In Diagnosis

Correlation Between Bipolar Disorder and Reactive Attachment Disorder

John F. Alston, M.D.

Historically, mental health professionals have long associated Attention Deficit Disorder with Reactive Attachment Disorder. It is true that children who have been abused and/or neglected do have attentional problems secondary to their abusive circumstances or brain maturational problems. Experts have put this correlation of ADD and RAD (Reactive Attachment Disorder) at between 40% and 70% for either abused/neglected children and/or adopted children.

In my experience as psychiatric consultant to the Attachment Center at Evergreen since 1977, as well as within my own private practice and consultations with other attachment programs and adoption agencies in which I supervise psychotherapists who work with attachment disorders, I have come to realize that Attention Deficit Disorder is vastly overdiagnosed in this clinical population, leading to inadequate, even contraindicated treatment. I have concluded that correlations between Bipolar Disorder and Reactive Attachment Disorder are indeed much more common. This conclusion has led to different, and in my experience, much more effective medical treatment plans for these children.

I have reached the above conclusion gradually over the last several years. In the past twenty five years, since my graduation from medical school, I have diagnosed and treated approximately 3,500 cases of ADD and approximately 1,000 cases of Bipolar Disorder. Particularly in my role as a consultant to The Attachment Center at Evergreen program, it has been my professional privilege and pleasure to assess and treat children from all over the United States and at least a few foreign countries. In my experience, this miscorrelation between ADD and Reactive Attachment Disorder is international.

Regrettably, mental health professionals, parents and adoption agencies, have had poor, even misleading histories of birth parents of abused/neglected adopted children. In our attempt to understand their psychological and/or physiological predispositions to various mental illnesses, family histories of mental illness are extremely important. Abused and neglected children, as we are all aware, develop reactive attachment or bonding difficulties that lead to oppositional and defiant conduct problems.

Despite this inadequacy of data regarding birth parents, enough information has emerged so that I can say with some degree of professional certainty that, in essence, there are four diagnoses of parents who are capable of abusing or neglecting their children. One of these is considered of psychological origin, one is alcohol and substance abuse, and two are well known genetic biochemical disorders. ADD is not among them.

1) Antisocial (sociopathic) Personality Disorder.

2) Disorders of Cognitive Perception, mostly Borderline Personality Disorder and Paranoid Schizophrenia.

The etiology of Borderline Personality Disorder is not well understood, but there is evidence of both genetic and psychological influences, to some degree attributable to poor parenting (neglect or over-protection) between birth and three years of age. Borderline Personality Disorder manifests as long-term patterns of unstable mood, interpersonal relationships and self image. They commonly over-determine others’ actions or intentions and are capable of inappropriate intense anger, rage and abuse. Paranoid Schizophrenia is a complex disorder, usually strongly genetically influenced and is characterized by thought disturbances such as delusions and hallucinations. They may be apathetic or have inappropriate affect (feeling tone). They tend to function at low levels of self care and have frequent hallucinations or delusions related to circumscribed themes of distrust. They relate poorly to others and others have a difficult time getting close to them. As such, they do not frequently cohabit, form lasting relationships or have children. In a delusional or hallucinatory state they are capable of abuse or neglect, though uncommonly.

3) Alcohol or Substance Abuse.

In my experience working with abused kids, this is the single most common characteristic of abusing parents. However, in my experience, it is also most commonly a coexistent factor of abuse. In other words, while alcohol and substance abusing parents may abuse their children, it is usually of less severity and is usually not in an ongoing manner. Purely alcohol or substance abusing parents who over-indulge and neglect or abuse their children are ordinarily regretful and remorseful of their actions.

On the other hand, if alcohol or substance abusing parents also have a coexisting Antisocial Personality Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder, Paranoid Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder, the intensity of the abuse is more severe and the extent of the abuse is far more lasting. Also, given the above coexistence factors, little remorse or regret is felt, leading to a cycle of continuing abusive situations.

4) Bipolar Disorder.

This is a common psychiatric mood disorder representing 2 to 3 percent of the general population. It is a genetic, inherited, familial disorder that ultimately results in biochemicalIt is a genetic, inherited, familial disorder that ultimately results in biochemical imbalances within one’s central nervous system. It manifests in manic (or hypomanic, a lesser form of manic) and/or depressive mood disturbances. In my professional experience, this is by far the disorder that has the greatest coincidence with abuse or neglect of children and as such is the genetic disorder that these children with coexistent Reactive Attachment Disorder also inherit. The degree of self centeredness, irritability and intensity of rage reactions while in a manic state is frequently sufficient to create severe abusive conditions. Correspon-dingly, the degree of profound depression is likewise severe and prolonged enough to create long standing neglectful circumstances.

ADD parents, in my professional opinion, uncommonly, even rarely, manifest sufficient self centeredness, irritability or intensivity and frequency of rage reactions. ADD parents are reality based, generally have a high regard for their children and even if they were to uncommonly abuse their children, are in almost all sets of circumstances ordinarily filled with enough regret and remorse as to learn from their own experiences and not repeat such actions. In other words, the abuse that they might render is ordinarily of a mild transient nature and not of the severe or prolonged degrees that we experience with children with emotional attachment or bonding problems.

While there are some characteristics in common between ADD and Bipolar Disorder in children, hopefully an experienced clinician can differentiate between the two. What I have just written, however, is indeed easier said than done. Probably all experienced clinicians, myself included, have made errors in clinical judgement, confusing these two disorders.

In somewhat of an over simplified manner, most ADD children manifest inattention (difficulty with focusing or sustaining concentration) and impulsivity. Approximately 50 percent of children with Attention Deficit Disorder are hyperactive. There usually are multiple subtle differences between ADD and Bipolar Disorder so as to hopefully differentiate between the two.

While some ADD kids have difficulty getting to sleep, many Bipolar children also manifest this symptom. Their mind can race or they may have some subjective experience that their thoughts are in some way accelerated. Bipolar children can commonly have more nightmares, including “gory” nightmares, where most ADD children, once they get to sleep, are frequently able to remain asleep.

While some ADD children are capable of having temper outbursts, these outbursts usually subside within a matter of serveral minutes. Bipolar kids’ rages can be of extremely intense degrees and may be prolonged over periods of a half an hour to a few hours duration. During that time, the Bipolar Disordered kids are capable of putting out an enormous amount of energy that is difficult for even an adult, while trying, to simulate. ADD children with temper outbursts commonly manifest them as a result of some form of overstimulation or overexcitation, whereas Bipolar children most commonly react to some form of limit setting.

While ADD kids can be moody, most would not be considered so. Bipolar kids, on the other hand, commonly would be described as both moody and exhibiting tendencies toward mood swings. These mood swings can have a great deal of dysphoria (a mood of general dissatisfaction) as well as oversensitivity and irritability leading to the above mentioned rage reactions.

Motivational factors also tend to differ between ADD and Bipolar children. ADD kids are truly inattentive and lack the capacity to sustain concentration. They tend to remain motivated and willing to please, though their follow through and resultant productivity can be poor. Bipolar childrens’ concentration depends much more on motivation and frequently manifests a similar but different symptom known as distractibility.

Bipolar children are much more “intense” by nature, whereas ADD kids are much more “laid back.” Bipolar kids can accomplish a great deal within a relatively short period of time. At times, they may appear especially motivated, enthused and interested in certain activities, and at other times their productivity will be practically nonexistent as they show almost no motivation, interests or enthusiasm, even for things they have historically enjoyed doing.

Bipolar children may even show certain giftedness or creativity, particularly along verbally articulate lines, whereas ADD kids usually are less inclined to the above characteristics. ADD kids “see the forest and not the trees”, i.e., getting a general feel for the “vibes” of a situation, while misunderstanding detail. Bipolar children, on the other hand, “see the trees and not the forest,” sometimes obsessing on detail, while missing the global picture. The misbehavior of ADD kids is often accidental, due to inattentiveness or obliviousness of circumstances. Bipolar children tend to be much more destructive. Bipolar children look as if their destructiveness has far more innate thoughtfulness, consciousness, deliberateness and purposefulness.

ADD tends to be chronic and continual, but tends toward gradual improvement with age and experience. While there may be no clear episodic or cyclic patterns within Bipolar children, their behavior tends to worsen over the years.

Obviously, all of the above attempt at differentiating between symptoms of ADD and Bipolar Disorder is made enormously more complex by the coexistent element of bonding and attachment disturbances. A further complicating factor is that stimulant medications may help specific symptoms of inattention and distractibility within Bipolar children, while they may also make tendencies toward irritability and rage reactions worse, particularly over extended periods of time. Mood stabilizing medications (Lithium, Valproic acid and Carbamazipine) tend to produce at least moderate improvement within Bipolar children, but tend to have minimal effect on ADD children.

Over the last few years, several books have been authored concerning ADD, but, to my knowledge, no such books exist regarding Bipolar Disorder, particularly in children. Many of these authors and experts have emphasized sleep problems, motivational problems, irritability, oppositional/defiant behavior, including rage reactions, as occurring fairly often within ADD. In my experience, all of these above symptoms are vastly overrated in most ADD children and underemphasized, both to the general population and to the mental health community in Bipolar Disorder.

In my strong professional opinion, all of the above symptom complex, particularly in children with coexistent histories of abuse, neglect and emotional bonding problems with corresponding oppositional and defiant behavior, should be considered to be of Bipolar etiology, not Attention Deficit Disorder, unless the previous ADD diagnosis and treatment has produced moderate to substantial benefits.